[Un-Authorized]

Posted By Chris Yaughn on 09 Feb 2012 10:49 PM

 

The Festool Saw has been the workhorse. 

Chris:

That’s next on my list.
Gotta suck that dust.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Posted By Tom M on 10 Feb 2012 09:54 AM
Well, this ain’t “Firing Line”, yanowatimeen?

Thanks, Tom. Lenny takes this much too seriously sometimes.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Posted By John Christensen on 10 Feb 2012 02:15 PM
I would strongly recommend enlisting the help and advice of a local CPA for these matters.

I suspect that guessing wrong could be costly.

Johnny C

Ding!Ding!Ding! we have our winner.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Chris:

So many guys only post their best stuff. I love it that you show it all, moulding included. Yeah, we know how it’s supposed to be done and all you purists can think what you please. Sometimes you just got to get ‘er done.

Good job and thanks,

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Posted By Lenny E on 08 Feb 2012 09:57 PM
While I was never a Santorum fan myself, it is kinda amusing to see the homos and athiests with their panties all in a bunch after these last 3 Santorum wins.

Lenny:

You haven’t even begun to see bunched panties.
If the Republicans are stupid enough to nominate the American Taliban as a presidential candidate, I will quit working and join the Obama campaign full-time.

The guys and girls who suffered life and limb defending our country didn’t do it just for the straight church-goers Lenny. They sacrificed for all of us, Godless and queer, included.

Let’s hope the Republican nominee shows as much respect to the Constitution with its pesky 14th Amendment (the one fatal to California’s Constitutional bigotry against gay marriage yesterday) as our fighting forces have.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Posted By Tom M on 09 Feb 2012 07:11 AM
Joe says:
“I’m not saying you are wrong, but you do need more than a sweeping generaliztion…”

then:
“Santorum won Minnesota. Geesh, what the hell are these people thinking? This guy is a lunatic; a fanatical Catholic the way some are fanatical Muslim.”

The irony gushes.

Touche Tommy!

I’ll make my case right after you make yours.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

This guy articulates my problems with Santorum better than I do myself.

Kowbot

[Un-Authorized]

Posted By Jon Olson on 08 Feb 2012 10:06 AM

 

 

I just cant see how crime will be different if instead of a chicken in every pot theres a gun in every drawer

 

 

Jon:

Just imagine you’re a home-invading criminal. I know that’s hard for a baby-face like you to do, but bear with me.

Right now you know there may or may not be a gun in your next victim’s home, but if you knew every single home you attempted to invade had a firearm
wouldn’t you start thinking of getting to the solid surface business or something?

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Santorum won Minnesota. Geesh, what the hell are these people thinking? This guy is a lunatic; a fanatical Catholic the way some are fanatical Muslim.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Wags:

Good to see you again.

While I agree that more guns means less crime, this shouldn’t be the pragmatism upon which we hang our collective holsters. I don’t care if crime rises when more folks own guns, it’s still our Constitutional right.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Posted By Tom M on 06 Feb 2012 07:11 AM
Joe,
A sweeping generalization is all I need. I see the direction Obama is heading and I don’t like it. Again, I was not so much a GW fan, far from it, but this is worse for a guy like me..

Tom:

I’m not saying you are wrong, but you do need more than a sweeping generaliztion. We need two columns, one with GWB’s (“We don’t need no stinkin’ Constitution.”) actions and those of Obama. Let’s compare fair and square.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Jon:

While your offer of $10,000.00 to not post this was quite generous, my larger obligation is to the audience.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Dang, you guys are harsh on Jon.

Well, he did start it.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Posted By Tom M on 04 Feb 2012 11:10 AM
Joe,
When Obama was elected, the hard right guys were saying that he wold close gitmo, stop all military action, and leave us with no foreign policy. Regardless of what he may have said and wanted to do, you just can’t do that, so it never happened. The same will be true of birth control and abortion. You will not overturn Roe in four years, regardless of how hard you try.

Having said that, if you are willing to give up one of the two fundamental articles of the constitution that make all the others possible, than have at it. I think it is faulty reasoning, myself.

Obama has amassed more power for the Presidency, and crapped on more of the Constitution than even GW did. Th regulations imposed on my business – small as it is – is onerous in the least.

Tom:

You’re right, he didn’t stop all military action. He put a bullet in the head of Osama Bin Laden and a few hijackers and kidnappers.

Like most things, it’s a bet. Will Obama get the chance to appoint more anti-gun Supremes? Will those appointments rule as he wants? Presidents have been disappointed before. Will Santorum ban birth control? You’re right, it isn’t very likely.

If the Republicans could get Ron Paul some traction, less government fiscally and socially, they would have better luck with me.

I’d like to see a direct comparison of Bush/Obama’s constitutional records other than a sweeping generalization.

Joe

[Un-Authorized]

Jon:

I’m gonna let this guy do my trash-talkin’ for me.

Giants 42, Pats 12.

From the anti-Olsen,

Joe

[Author]

Posts